Self assessment
Background information about self assessment
Ideas:
Defining assessment criteria, grading and then justifying grading all by students.
This article describes a case study of the School of Engineering in University of Minho where peer and self-assessment are implemented as a method for improving student learning. In this self-assessment, students have the opportunity to define the assessment criteria, correct their own work, grade and justify the grading of assessments, make recommendations for future improvements and write a personal reflection on the assessment process. Read the paper here:http://www.igi-global.com/Gateway/ContentOwned/Chapters.aspx?TitleId=887
Variations in self-assessment logistics.
Angelo and Cross (1993) suggested that self-assessment can vary in terms of questions, means and time of administration. Self-assessment can be done with structured, open-ended questions, or a combination of both questions so as to encourage detailed responses. Depending on accessibility and convenience, self-assessment can be done in hard copies of questionnaire or online surveys. The period of administration should be flexible and yet timely in order to facilitate autonomy among students and to solicit regular feedback, respectively.
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ready-made self-assessment toolkits.
This web site has prepared some toolkits to show students and staff how to prepare for self-assessment. These toolkits provide guidance about what we need to think about and what questions we need to ask when we hold a self-assessment session. An example of an audit sheet can also be downloaded from the web site. Read the details here: http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/toolkit/schools/selfpeer.asp